KANCHAN DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/5671/2025 · 2025-06-25
Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148078 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36433-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5671 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kanchan Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Singh,Priyanshi Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. Heard. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the F.I.R. No. 98 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 131, 333, 351(3), 109(1), 110, 324(2), 333 BNS, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a female aged about 47 years and allegations were levelled in the FIR against her entire family members. Learned A.G.A. for the State on the basis of instructions states that chargesheet has been prepared and is pending with supervisory authority, as such, the apprehension of arrest does not exist. In view of the aforesaid statement, the present writ petition is
disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to take such steps as advised by learned counsel for the petitioner under law in case the chargesheet is filed against the petitioner. It is clarified that in view of the statement of learned A.G.A. no coercive measures shall be taken against the petitioner till the filing of chargesheet.
Order Date :- 25.6.2025 J. K. Dinkar (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench