SUSHEELA RAY v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH COLLECTOR
WPMS/2352/2016 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14807 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14807 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
`
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.2352 of 2016 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
List revised.
2. There is no representation for the petitioners as well as for respondent no.5.
3. Mr. Sudhir Nailwal, S.C. for the State.
4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
09.12.2025 SK