Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 696 of 2025 Revisionist :- Km. Sarita Devi @ Sarita And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Syed Mohd. Munis Jafari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned AGA. Instant revision has been preferred by the revisionists for setting aside the summoning order dated 18.03.2025 in Complaint No.655 of 2024; Brij Bhushan Singh vs. Anil Kumar and others under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4), 333 B.N.S., Police Station-Tarun, District-Ayodhya passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Ayodhya as well as staying the operation and implementation of the aforesaid order and the proceeding in furtherance of the aforesaid order. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the revisionists confines his prayer to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another;(2021) 10 SCC 773. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the revisionists. On due consideration of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the revisionists move bail application before the trial court within fifteen days' from today, the same shall be decided within a period of two weeks thereafter in accordance with the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra). With the aforesaid, the revision is disposed of. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench