BHUPENDRA VIKRAM SINGH v. DISTRICT JUDGE RAEBARELI AND ANOTHER
A227/3882/2025 · 2025-07-01
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148064 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36877 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3882 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhupendra Vikram Singh Respondent :- District Judge Raebareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopesh Tripathi,Devendra Pratap Singh Kamal,Hrishabh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. and Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3884 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shashi Bala Agarwal Respondent :- District Judge, Raibareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopesh Tripathi,Devendra Pratap Singh Kamal,Hrishabh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petitions have been filed challenging the interlocutory order dated 29.05.2025 passed by the District Judge in the appeals preferred by the petitioners. By means of the said order, the appellate court has directed and stayed the
order, subject to deposit of the damages.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there was no quantification of the damages and how the damages were ascertained is not indicated in the impugned orders. It is further argued that the order impugned before the appellate authority is without jurisdiction.
4. Considering the said submissions, both the petitions are
disposed of with direction to the appellate court to decide the pending appeal with all expedition.
5. Subject to the petitioners depositing an amount of Rs.1 lac within a period of two months from today, the execution shall remain stayed, subject to the outcome of the appeal.
Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench