PUTTU LAL AND ORS. v. SYED IRSHAD HUSAIN ALIAS TEEPU
SAPL/269/2014 · 2025-02-18
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148060 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 4 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 269 of 2014 Appellant :- Puttu Lal And Ors. Respondent :- Syed Irshad Husain Alias Teepu Counsel for Appellant :- Anurag Srivastava,Arvind Kumar Pandey,Shabih Fatima Counsel for Respondent :- P.S. Bajpai,Waseem Ahmad Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Shri Anurag Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellants is reported to be on sanctioned leave. Shri P.S. Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the case is being conducted by Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate, which is apparent from the order dated 13.01.2025 as on the said date the case was adjourned on an out of station slip of Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey and while adjourning the case it was made clear that the case shall not be adjourned on the next date. Today, there is no request on behalf of Shri Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate for adjournment, therefore, it appears that the appellant does not want to pursue the case, therefore, the case is being got adjourned by one or the other counsel. Dismissed accordingly for non prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Haseen U. Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench