HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 55420 of 2014 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Pravesh Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Arvind Kumar Goswami, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel for respondent - BHEL. 2. The petitioner has not challenged an order dated 4th August, 2004, which is against him that petitioner was declared medically unfit that he was able to see only from one eye for the post i.e. Supervisor Trainee (Engineering) where locomotor disability and hearing impediment was considered as a disability. 3. In the aforesaid circumstances, petitioner's case is rejected on two grounds that not only petitioner has not challenged the aforesaid order but petitioner has not come up with any legal or factual proposition that claim of petitioner can still be considered. Otherwise also petitioner is presently aged about 40 years as such he has already crossed minimum age of service, therefore, there is no reason to allow, the prayer that petitioner be considered for appointment. Otherwise also advertisement is also not under challenge. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. September 8, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pravesh Kumar, Santosh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Kumar Goswami, Ashish Mishra, S.C., Tarun Varma, Tarun Verma (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Yatendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad