INDRAMANI TRIPATHI v. DISTRICT JUDGE SULTANPUR AND ORS.
A227/248/2019 · 2025-04-01
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18084
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 248 of 2019 Petitioner :- Indramani Tripathi Respondent :- District Judge Sultanpur And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Anubhav Awasthi,Manoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Umesh Chandra Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 31.10.2018 whereby the injunction was refused and the appeal preferred against the said order was also dismissed vide impugned order dated 11.12.2018.
3. While dismissing the appeal, the appellate court noticed that the pleadings in support of the plaint that he had easementary rights, were contrary to the facts. In any case, the suit is to be decided as is of the year 2017, as such, seeing no reason to interfere with the said two orders, the present petition is
disposed off with direction to decide the Suit No.374 of 2017 expeditiously without giving any adjournments to any of the parties with all expedition.
Order Date :- 1.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench