RAMESH SAROJ @ KALLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
A482/5254/2025 · 2025-07-02
Subhash Vidyarthi
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148001 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148001 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37286 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5254 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramesh Saroj @ Kallu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Puttu Lal Misra,Prince Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Puttu Lal Misra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well a Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as under:
"i. FIR/Case Crime No.0071 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh, ii. FIR/Case Crime No.117 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 504, 506, 352, 353 I.P.C. & Section 2/3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh, and iii. FIR/Case Crime No.72 of 2020, under Sections 60(1), 60(2), 63 of Excise Act, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh."
4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. .
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench