Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14799 (RAJ)

DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD PARASHAR SON OF SHRI MANGTI LAL SHARMA v. SMT. POONAM

CCP/308/2024 · 2025-09-04

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35620-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 308/2024 Dr. Rajendra Prasad Parashar Son Of Shri Mangti Lal Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of 123, Krisshna Vihar, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Poonam, Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Akhil Arora, Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Hemant Kumar Gera, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 312/2024 1. Dr. Mahendra Kumar Gupta Son Of Shri Kedar Nath Gupta, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village Post Chhonkarwara District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Ashok Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Dwarka Prasad Agrawal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 1/12, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Poonam , Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikista Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Goverment Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Akhil Arora , Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Hemant Kumar Gera, Principal Secretary, Department Of [2025:RJ-JP:35620-DB] (2 of 3) [CCP-308/2024] Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 550/2024 Dr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Yadram Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village- Post- Pathena, Tehsil- Bhusawar, District- Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Akhil Arora, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Smt. Poonam, Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Sawan Kumar Chayal, Deputy Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chiktsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma, Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg with Mr. Ayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General assisted by Mr.Sheetanshu Sharma & Mr. Tanay Goyal Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Ms. Sunita Meena, [2025:RJ-JP:35620-DB] (3 of 3) [CCP-308/2024] Mr. Aakash Mewara, Ms. Epsa Nangalia, Mr. Kartikeya Shukla & Ms. Kavita Sharma Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathore & Mr. Aaditya Godara HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 04/09/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these contempt petitions with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. These contempt petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/35-36, 41