Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21435] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4876/2025 Hemraj S/o Harji, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Jotayan Tan Tantoti Police Station Sarna District Ajmer (Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.390/2024 registered at Police Station-Jobner, District-Jaipur Rural for the offences under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the offences are triable by the Magistrate. Counsel further submits that there is no previous case registered against him. Petitioner is behind the bars since 23.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail
[2025:RJ-JP:21435] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4876/2025] application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Hemraj S/o Harji shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/129