Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010221232021 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2048/2025 GOPAL KRISHNA CHAKRABORTY S/O- LATE KAMINI KUMAR CHAKRABORTY R/O- 2ND LINK ROAD LANE NO. 13 PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM-788003 2: MANIK CHAND LUNIA S/O- LATE LAL CHAND LUNIA R/O- PREMTALA PO- AND PS- SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM-788003 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-781006 2:DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM DISPUR GHY-781006 3:SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD SADARGHAT ROAD PO AND PS- SILCHAR Page No.# 2/3 DIST- CACHAR ASSAM-788001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN 4:THE CHAIRMAN SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM-788001 5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SILCHAR MUNICIPAL BOARD PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM-788001 6:SILCHAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TRUNK ROAD SILCHAR TOWN PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST-CACHAR ASSAM-788001 7:SMTI. MANISHA BHATTACHARJEE W/O- DR. SANKAR BHATTACHARJEE R/O- SATSANGA ASHRAM ROAD SILCHAR PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM-788007 8:DR. SANJAR BHATTACHARJEE R/O SATSANGA ASHRAM ROAD SILCHAR PO AND PS- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM-788007 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A DHAR Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 23.07.2025 Heard Mr. A. Dhar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. S. Mushahary, learned counsel, appearing for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4, as well as Mr. G.R. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.7. The present Interlocutory Application has been instituted praying for deletion of the name of the opposite party no.8, who is the respondent no.8 in the connected Writ Petition, on the ground that he is not a necessary and proper party for adjudication of the issues arising in the connected writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondents have not objected to the said prayer. In view of the above, this Court directs that the name of the respondent no.8 in the connected Writ Petition be deleted. Accordingly, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant