SATYAM SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/5567/2025 · 2025-07-02
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37145-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5567 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satyam Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Singh,Nitesh Kumar Mishra,Shikhar Chaube Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned A.G.A., who appears for the State/respondents and perused the record.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 02.06.2025 bearing Case Crime No.0214 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), 352 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) of the S.C./S.T. Act registered at Police Station Banthara, District Lucknow.
3. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, says that the investigating officer during the course of investigation has not found any credible evidence against the petitioner and his name has been deleted from the list of accused persons. Instructions are taken on record.
4. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench