1 APHC010185102016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 32514/2016 Between: 1. V.S.R.CONSTRUCTIONS,, 29/178-32-D2-2, SBI COLONY, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, V. SATYANARAYANA REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HANDIRI NEEVASRUJ ALASHRAVANTI, CIRCLE NO 1, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH EN ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the Memo No DWA/AP/Hyd/Sn.1/A1(2016-2017)/No 217 dated 22.08.2016 as not applicable to the petitioner as the said memo is illegal, unilateral, illegal and against the principles of natural justice IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40225 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation of the No.DWA/AP/Hyd/Sn.1/A1(2016-2017)/No 217 dated 22.08.2016 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Today when the matter came up for hearing, Sri. Varun Byreddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the cause in the present writ petition would not survive for further adjudication and that no further orders are necessary in the present petition. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 19.08.2025 GSS