RSA-399-20 IN THE HIG 225 Gurnam Sing Kulwant Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment an District Judg respondent decree dated (Senior Divi appellant-pla 2. appeal is ye notice in the CPC for con appeal was i 01.12.2014. 2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o m Singh Versus nt Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Aman Gautam, Advocate fo Mr. Ashutosh Sharma, Advocat Mr. Gourav Jain, Advocate for respondents No. 1, 4 and 4 t I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiff is in ent and decree dated 03.11.2010, pass t Judge, Fatehabad, whereby two s dent-defendants have been allowed dated 29.04.2009, passed by the lea r Division), Fatehabad; and the suit plaintiff was dismissed. The matter pertains to the year l is yet to be issued. Perusal of the in the application bearing CM-901-C or condonation of delay of 999 days l was issued by the Predecessor Bench 2014. Thereafter, the matter was repe ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-399-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA cate for dvocate for the appellant. nd 4 to 8. in second appeal against the , passed by the learned Additional two separate appeals filed by the setting aside the judgment and the learned Additional Civil Judge e suit for declaration filed by the e year 2014 and notice in the main of the order-sheet(s) reveal(s) that C-2014 filed under Section 151 days in refilling the accompanying ch of this Court vide order dated s repeatedly adjourned primarily at the onal the and dge the ain that 151 ying ated ly at RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.12 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-399-20 the oral/wri 11.09.2015, non-appeara 3. for an adjou personal diff 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution 5. 6. 10.11.2025 rishu 2014 (O&M) -2- ral/written request of learned cou 2015, 28.02.2018, 04.04.2022 and 3 pearance on behalf of the appellant on Today again, learned proxy co adjournment on the ground that learn al difficulty. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable d counsel for the appellant on and 30.11.2022; or on account of lant on 24.04.2015 and 10.05.2016. xy counsel for the appellant prays t learned arguing counsel is in some facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No on t of rays ome llant sent the the ly his this RISHU KATARIA 2025.11.12 19:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.