AJEET KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/5577/2025 · 2025-06-24
Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147875 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36282-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5577 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. Sri Santosh Kumar Kanaujia, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No.4 and has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court along with short counter affidavit. The same is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.4 and learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Supplementary affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record. 4.The present writ petition has been filed challenging F.I.R. dated 31.05.2025 in Case Crime No. 84 of 2025, under Sections 69, 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Itaunja, District Lucknow.
5. It is contended that the informant/opposite party no.4 raised allegations regarding sexual assault, however during the course of time petitioner No.1 and opposite party No.4 solemnized marriage and the same got registered. The registration certificate has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition.
6. The aforesaid fact has not been denied by learned counsel for the opposite party No. 4, rather the same has been substantiated by by filing compromise by the informant.
7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the F.I.R.pending, as such, F.I.R.in question i.e dated 31.05.2025 in Case Crime No. 84 of 2025, under Sections 69, 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., Police Station Itaunja, District Lucknow is quashed.
8. The petition stands allowed with the said observations/directions. (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Order Date :- 24.6.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench