CHAND HASAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/5234/2025 · 2025-07-02
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37221 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5234 of 2025 Applicant :- Chand Hasan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girdhari Lal Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Girdhari Lal Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mayank Sinha, the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application filed under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant challenging the validity of orders dated 27.05.2025, 31.05.2025 and 10.06.2025, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Court No.11, POCSO Act, Unnao in Sessions Trial No.240 of 2018, arising out of Case crime No.243 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. & Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Hasanganj, Disrict Unnao, whereby non-bailable warrants has been issued due to non appearance of the applicant.
3. The trial court has not committed any error or illegality in issuance of non-bailable warrant when the applicant failed to appear before the trial court and no application for adjournment or for grant of exemption from appearance was moved on behalf of the applicant.
4. There is no illegality in the impugned order. The application lacks merit and the same is accordingly dismissed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench