( 2025:JHHC:14567 ) Page-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3072 of 2025 1. Nasrul Mian @ Md. Nasarul Ansari, aged about 34 years, Son of Sokhi Miyan. 2. Shamsad Mian @ Shamsad Ansari, aged about 28 years, Son of Nasad Miyan. 3. Maksud Mian @ Maksed Mian, aged about 25 years, Son of Nausad Ansari. 4. Chuna Mian @ Gulam Rasool, aged about 38 years, Son of Late Sokhi Mian. 5. Dina Mian @ Masraf Mian, aged about 36 years, Son of Sokhi Mian Mian. 6. Nasima Bibi, aged about 45 years, Wife of Nasad Miyan. 7. Sabera Bibi @ Sehara Bibi, aged about 25 years, Wife of Ruma Miyan. 8. Khaibari Bibi, aged about 35 years, Wife of Munna Mian. 9. Faziran Bibi, aged about 30 years, Wife of Dina Mian. 10. Tabasum Khatoon @ Tabsum Khatoon, aged about 25 years, Wife of Samshad Mian. 11. Munna Mian @ Sagir Mian, aged about 37 years, Son of late Sokhi Mian. All the petitioners are the resident of Village- Asahna, P.O.- Dumaria, P.S.- Palojori (Deoghar). …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. --------- Order No. 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending their arrest in connection with Palajori P.S. Case No. 66 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 303(2), 109 and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. ( 2025:JHHC:14567 ) Page-2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive and personal grudge. It is further submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioners are vague and omnibus. He lastly submits that all the co-accused persons in respect of Palojori P.S.case No. 65 of 2025 have been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. As such, he may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur, District-Deoghar. 6. It is made clear that petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation / trial. If the petitioners will not co-operate with the investigation / trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Simran-Aditi/