Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37376 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5273 of 2025 Applicant :- Ayan @ Shoeb Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Home Dept. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ujjwal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Ujjwal Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri S.P. Singh, the learned State Counsel and perused the records. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in 11 cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in ten criminal cases and has been granted bail by the High Court as well as Sessions Court, the details of cases are as under :- "i. Crime No. 295/2023, U/S 379/ 411/ 413/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 IPC, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow. ii. Crime No. 296/2023, U/S 379/ 411/ 413/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 IPC, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow. iii. Crime No. 302/2023, U/S 379/ 411/ 413/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 IPC, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow. iv. Crime No. 70/2023, U/S 379/ 411 IPC, P.S. Husainganj, Lucknow. v. Crime No. 399/2023, U/S 379/ 411/ 413/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471 IPC, P.S. PGI, Lucknow. vi. Crime No. 177/2023, U/S 379/ 411 IPC, P.S. Aliganj, Lucknow. vii. Crime No. 288/2023, U/S 379/ 411/ 413 IPC, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow. viii. Crime No. 77/2023, U/S 379/ 411 IPC, P.S. Qaisarbagh, Lucknow. ix. Crime No. 163/2022, U/S 379/ 411 IPC, P.S. Cantt., Lucknow. x. Crime No. 188/2023, U/S 379/ 411 IPC, P.S. Gudamba, Lucknow. xi. Crime No. 206/2024, U/S 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti- social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow." 4. The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court. 5. In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties for one lakh each for release in all the 11 cases. 6. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each and atleast one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the 11 cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench