Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14784 (PNJ)

RAMAN KUMAR AND OTHERS v. SH DILRAJ SINGH IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/268/2025 · 2025-04-07

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.268 of 202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 143-4 RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS. SH. DILRAJ SINGH, IAS & OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. for the petitioner Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble vide order dated cases. 2. In view of the above, the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned 3. Disposed of 4. Rule stands discharged. April 07, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: RAMAN KUMAR AND ORS. ...... Vs DILRAJ SINGH, IAS & OTHERS ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Charanpal Singh Bagri, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel informs that the order by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed in LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned Disposed of being not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.268 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 ......Petitioners ....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate counsel informs that the order dated 27.08.2024 passed by the Writ Court has been stayed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present petition, subject to final outcome of the aforementioned LPA. not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 passed Division Bench of this Court LPA No.271 of 2025 & other connected does not press the present petition at this stage, however, seeks liberty to revive the present MOHMED ATIK 2025.04.07 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment