Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 147836 (ALL)

NEETU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5642/2025 · 2025-06-25

Kshitij Shailendra, Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36385-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5642 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neetu And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Diwakar Prasad Sharma,Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1.Instructions furnished to the Court are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondents. 3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent-authorities not to harass the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage out of their sweet will. Necessary documents in relation to age proof and certificate issued by Arya Samaj Shivpuri Kamta, Chinhat, Lucknow have also been annexed with the writ petition. 5. Though, it is contended that no first information report has been lodged in the instant case, learned AGA stated that the FIR was infact lodged and after completing investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted final report in the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-authorities not to cause any harassment or any interference in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. Order Date :- 25.6.2025 Sazia (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Pankaj Bhatia, J) Digitally signed by :- SAZIA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench