Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010135822023 2025:GAU-AS:12127 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3616/2023 MD. KAMRUZAMAN KHAN AND 7 ORS S/O LATE IDRISH ALI KHAN, R/O VILL-LELAIBORI, P.O.-GOROIMARI, P.S.- LAHORIGHAT, DIST-MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782104 2: MD. ARAJ ALI S/O LATE INTAZ ALI R/O VILL-LELAIBORI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 3: MD. TAHUR UDDIN S/O LATE NEKBOR ALI R/O VILL-GOROIMARI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 4: MD. MOFIZ UDDIN S/O AKBOR ALI R/O VILL-GOROIMARI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 5: MD. JALAL UDDIN S/O HAZARAT ALI R/O VILL-GOROIMARI Page No.# 2/4 P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 6: MD. FAJAR ALI S/O HAMED ALI R/O VILL- LELAIBORI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST- MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 7: MD. RUSMAT ALI S/O RAHMAT ULLAH R/O VILL-GOROIMARI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782104 8: MD. SHAHIDUL ISLAM S/O SADER ALI R/O VILL-LELAIBORI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78210 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-781022 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MORIGOAN DIST-MORIGAON Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM PIN-782105 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CEO) ZILLA PARISHAD DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782105 5:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER LAHORIGHAT ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782127 6:THE PRESIDENT LAHORIGHAT ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782127 7:MD. ASHREFUL ISLAM S/O RAMJAN ALI R/O VILL-GOROIMARI P.O.-GOROIMARI P.S.-LAHORIGHAT DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78210 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U DUTTA, B DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 05-09-2025 Heard Mr. U. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners, who submits that as the challenge made in this writ petition is to the settlement of market for the period 2023-24, the matter has become infructuous. Page No.# 4/4 Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Interim order passed earlier, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant