GHULAM MOHIDIN RATHER v. SHAFAT SULTAN AND ANR. (J AND K HORTICULTRE PRODUCE MARKETING AND PROCESSING)
RP/79/2022 · 2025-12-19
Sanjeev Kumar, Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14776 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14776 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 1 Suppl. cause list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
RP 79/2022 IN LPASW 7/2019 GHULAM MOHIDIN RATHER
…Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. T.H. Khawaja, Sr. Advocate. Vs.
SHAFAT SULTAN AND ANR
…Respondent (s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 19.12.2025
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing for a while seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appropriate application seeking clarification as has been done in the case of “Fatima & Ors vs.
UT of J&K & Ors” in LPASW No. 6/2019.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 19.12.2025
“Shahid Manzoor”