ANSH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/6914/2025 · 2025-07-23
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42356 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6914 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ansh Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for oppsotie parties.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for issuance of appointment letter on the post of Police Constable (Civil) in the light of his merit position in the select list. Further prayer for permitting petitioner to undergo joint training course has also been sought.
4. It has been submitted that appointment letter in pursuance of petitioner's selection was not issued on account of FIR registered as Case Crime No.11 of 2025, under Sections 498-A, 376, 323, 504, 506 IPC read with Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act being registered against petitioner.
5. It is submitted that subsequently charge-sheet has been submitted in the criminal case on 05.06.2025 removing Section 376 IPC.
6. As such, it is submitted that the aspect of moral turpitude now does not enter into the picture and the FIR itself is only on the basis of matrimonial dispute.
7. Upon consideration of submissions advanced, it appears that petitioner has been selected for the aforesaid post in the select list indicating his name at serial no. 38845. It also appears that Section 376 IPC has been removed in the charge-sheet, which was filed and upon which cognizance has been taken.
8. Learned counsel for petitioner has placed reliance on
judgment rendered by High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in the case of Ranveer Kumar versus Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6136 of 2015.
9. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.6 i.e. Superintendent of Police, District Kheri who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority in the light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable. Petitioner shall annex a copy of the aforesaid judgment alongwith a certified copy of this order.
10. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 23.7.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench