Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14775 (HP)

Sukh Ram and another v. National High Way Authority of India

OMPM/115/2024 · 2025-06-20

Ranjan Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sukh Ram & anr. versus National Highway Authority of India OMP(M) No.115 of 2024 20.06.2025 Present: Mr. Sanket Sankhyan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate vice Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the non-applicant/respondent. OMP(M) No.115 of 2024 Instant application has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking condonation of 18 days of delay in filing the instant appeal. 2. Perusal of Paras 3 & 4 of the application indicates that delay had occurred as the certified copy of the orders dated 20.01.2024 could not be applied by the office Clerk concerned within time. Application is supported by an affidavit. 3. Pursuant to issuance of notice, the non- applicant-respondent has filed the reply, objecting to the condonation of delay on the ground that the reasons do not disclose a sufficient cause and therefore, in these circumstances, prayer is made for not allowing the application. 4. Taking into account the entirety of the facts and circumstances coupled with the fact that a litigant should not suffer either due to the fault of learned counsel or his office staff as in this case, coupled with the fact that arguable points are involved in the accompanying appeal, therefore, the application is allowed and the delay of 18 days in filing the accompanying the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Arbitration Appeal No._____ of 2025 Appeal be registered. List the matter after two weeks. (Ranjan Sharma) June 20, 2025 Judge [Shivender]