KRISHAN KUMAR SINGH IN ADHAR KIRISHNA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6087/2025 · 2025-06-30
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147743 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147743 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36791 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6087 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishan Kumar Singh In Adhar Kirishna Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Kumar Singh,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Tushar Gupta, Advocate holding breif of Sri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 and Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari there by quashing the impugned order dated 10.06.2025 passed by opposite party No. 2 in appeal No. 1406/2024 computerkrit case No. C202408000001406 (Krishan Kumar Singh Vs. Sharafraj Singh and others) u/s 207 U.P. Revenue code 2006 whereby appeal has been dismissed and against the
order dated 18.04.2024 passed by opposite party No. 3 in case No. 3085/2023 computerkrit case No. T202308300503085 (Sarafraj Singh Vs. Krishan Singh) u/s 116 U.P. Revenue code contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ of order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the respondents restrain for disturbance in peaceful possession of the petitioner from land in dispute during pendency of the present petition in the interest of justice." At the very outset, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5 as well as opposite party no. 4 have raised preliminary objection that against the impugned order, statutory remedy of second appeal lies, therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable. At the is stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that against the impugned order passed in appeal, second appeal lies, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present application to avail the remedy of second appeal. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. Certified copy of the impugned orders to be returned to the
learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopy of the same.
Order Date :- 30.6.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench