Gudimetla Rarnalakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/11922/2020 · 2025-04-25
T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14774 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14774 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010186072020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.11922/2020 Between: Gudimetla Rarnalakshmi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
25.04.2025 DR
46 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
WP No.11922 of 2020 Date 25.04.2025
DR