Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36232 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6913 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sachidanand Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Handloom And Textiles Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ghaus Beg Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed impugned transfer order dated 15.06.2025 passed by the Joint Commissioner, Directorate of Handloom & Textiles, Uttar Pradesh, Kanpur (opposite party no.3). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was earlier transferred vide order dated 15.04.2025, which was challenged before this Court by filing Writ-A No.4468 of 2025. This Court passed order dated 01.05.2025 mentioning therein that since the concerned Minister has recommended for cancellation of the transfer order, it was provided that till a decision on such recommendation is taken, the petitioner shall not be relieved from the present place of posting. Thereafter the transfer order dated 15.04.2025 was cancelled by the Department itself vide order dated 06.05.2025. 4. It is also submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the present transfer order has been passed after one month, which is a malafide and illegal. He has further submitted that terms of the transfer policy have not been adhered as the wife of petitioner is suffering from various illness. 5. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State has opposed the writ petition and has submitted that it is a routine transfer, therefore, there is no illegality or infirmity in the transfer order passed by the competent authority. 6. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. Commissioner & Director, Directorate of Handloom & Textiles, Uttar Pradesh, Kanpur within a week and the same shall be considered and decided by the opposite party no.2 within three weeks thereafter. 7. It is provided that till the decision is taken on the representation moved by the petitioner as provided above or till four weeks, whichever is earlier, the petitioner shall not be relieved from his present place of posting. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Order Date :- 24.6.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench