SAMSUL SK ALIAS SAMSUL SHEKH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4415/2025 · 2025-06-03
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14426
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4415 of 2025 ----- Samsul Sk @ Samsul Shekh, son of Rafu Shekh @ Rafijuddin Sk, resident of Village Rahaspur, P.O. Rahaspur, P.S. Pakur (M), District Pakur (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----- For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. -----
03/ Dated : 03.06.2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
This bail application under Section 483 & 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail for offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115, 117, 109, 332(c), 303(2), 76, 324(5), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3.
Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that co-accused namely Jainal Abedin @ Md. Jainal Abedin, has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 in B.A. No.1403 of 2025 and the case of this petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused. He further submits that a feud occurred between the parties which resulted in filing of the case and counter case between the parties. Lastly, he submits that the petitioner is languishing in jail since
01.04.2025. As such, he may be enlarged on bail.
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the present Bail Application is
2025:JHHC:14426
2
allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Pakur, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.246 of 2024.
6.
It is made clear that till commencement of trial, the petitioner shall report to the local Police Station every month and after commencement of trial, he shall appear on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Prashant/Cp-3