Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36925 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5222 of 2025 Applicant :- Sajjad @ Bangali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Shukla,Devendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Prashant Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Satyendra Kumar Srivastava, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in nine cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in nine criminal cases and has been granted bail by the learned High Court/courts below, the details of cases are as under :- (i) Case Crime No. 09/2023 under Sections 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Sadatganj, District Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 24/2023 under Sections 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Sadatganj, District Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No. 26/2023 under Section 3 and 25 of Arms Act IPC, Police Station Sadatganj, District Lucknow. (iv) Case Crime No. 60/2023 under Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow. (v) Case Crime No. 87/2023 under Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow. (vi) Case Crime No. 70/2023 under Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow. (vii) Case Crime No. 648/2021 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC, Police Station Thakurganj, District Lucknow. (viii) Case Crime No.43/2023 under Sections 380, 411 IPC, Police Station Sarojininagar, District Lucknow. (ix) Case Crime No.876/2022 under Sections 380, 411, 457 IPC, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. 5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other eight cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench