SHAHID ALI and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER
A482/2710/2018 · 2025-05-14
Om Prakash Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147644 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147644 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28223 Court No. - 30 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2710 of 2018 Applicant :- Shahid Ali And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Raman Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Amjad Siddiqui,Narendra Gupta Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed to quash the proceeding of Complaint Case No.318/2017 (Nasreen Bano vs. Shahid Ali and others) under Section 376, 452, 506 and 120-B I.P.C. at Police Station-Biswan, District- Sitapur pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Sitapur as well as summoning order dated 07.10.2017 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Sitapur in Case No.318/2017. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application with liberty to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court and the same may be decided by the learned trial court in a time bound manner. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed providing that in case, the applicants move an appropriate application for discharge through counsel before the concerned trial court within a period of fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months in accordance with law, by the concerned trial court. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) Order Date :- 14.5.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench