Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14764 (JHR)

SUNIL KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4898/2025 · 2025-06-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:16384 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4898 of 2025 ------ Sunil Kumar Mandal, aged about 22 years, son of Kishore Mandal, resident of village Jagadih, P.O. & P.S. Karon, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 20-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 registered under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 C of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Anil Pachpande to the tune of Rs.21,000/- and Rajesh Jain to the tune of Rs.9,422/- and the petitioner has been implicated in this case, only on the basis of recovery of one mobile phone with one sim card from his possession. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-14 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will transfer the respective amounts allegedly defrauded from the bank account of the said victims; to the victims. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.03.2025 as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transferring Rs.21,000/- and Rs.9,422/- respectively in the account of Anil Pachpande and Rajesh Jain and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/