Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36777 Court No. - 3 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3877 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satyapal Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Gonda And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Giri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta,Umeshwar Pratap Pandey,Yogendra Mishra Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Sri Shobhit Nigam, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.5 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Rama Kant Giri, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Shobhit Nigam, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and Sri Umeshwar Pratap Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.6. 3. Present petition has been filed for the following reliefs; i. To direct the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Barabanki to decide the interim relief application of the petitioners on day to day basis due to reason that the order dated 22.07.2024 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Colonelganj, Gonda would be implemented in the revenue records through proceeding under Rule 109-A of U.P. C.H. Rules, 1954 with arbitrary manner. ii. to stay the effect of order dated 22.07.2024 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Colonelganj, Gonda in Case No.5 of 1990-1991 "Khelawan vs Bat Pal" and also stay the effect of order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation (Admn.), Barabanki contrary to law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Satish Kumar vs Surendra Kumar" report in AIR 1970 page 833 and also contrary to law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of "T. Gnanvel and T.S. Kanan Garaj 2009 (75) A.L.R. 515 and further contrary to law laid down by this Hon'ble Court in case of "Baghwan Bahadur vs D.D.C." report in R.D. 2024 page and further in case of "Munder vs D.D.C." reported in LCD 2024 Volume (3) Page 1760. 4. After the argument at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is pressing only prayer no.1 regarding disposal of stay application by the revisional court. It is further submitted that as next date fixed is 9th July, 2025, therefore, Deputy Director of Consolidation, Barabanki may be directed to decide the stay application of the petitioner filed along with revision. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the interim relief application of the petitioner pending in the Revision No.871 of 2025 on the next date of listing before the revisional court. Order Date :- 30.6.2025 A.Kr* Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench