RAJNATH ALIAS PAPPU SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR DIST. AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS
A227/3861/2025 · 2025-06-27
Subhash Chandra Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147604 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36633 Court No. - 3 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3861 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajnath Alias Pappu Sharma And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Dist. Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned C.C.S. and perused material on record. The present petition has been filed for the following relief:
"I. Direct the opposite party no. 2 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the interim relief application pending in Revision No. 277 of 2025 Computerized Case No. C202504000000277, Rajnath @ Pappu Sharma and others Vs. Manju Devi and others, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and further direct to opposite party no. 4 and 5 to not alienate the property during pendency of the revision, in the interest of justice. II. Any other order or direction which this Court deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of petitioner be passed in the interest of justice." It is submitted that in this case, he has filed a Revision No. 277 of 2025, Rajnath @ Pappu Sharma and others Vs. Manju Devi and others, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the learned Additional Commissioner (Administration) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya with interim relief application, therefore, request to direct the opposite party no. 2 to decide the interim relief application as expeditiously as possible within stipulated period of time. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by
learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, it is expedient to direct the opposite party no. 2 to make its endeavour to decide the case in accordance with law within a period of 30 days, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition stands disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 27.6.2025 Anurag Singh Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench