[2025:RJ-JP:18531] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5087/2025 Lokesh S/o Halkeram, R/o Rahir, Police Station Karanpur, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Accuse Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 938/2025 Darshan Son Of Shri Javansingh, Resident Of Rajpur Police Station Sadar Karauli District Karauli (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Gajendra Meena Son Of Shri Kaduram Meena, Resident Of Langadapura Police Station Mamchari District Karauli (Raj) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Jadoun Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/05/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0473/2023 registered at Police Station-Karauli, District-Karauli for the offenc under Section 364-A of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:18531] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5087/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submits that during cross-examination, the victim Kaptan @ Bhalla Meena has admitted that no test identification parade was conducted by the Investigating Officer. In cross-examination the present accused were not identified by the victim Kaptan @ Bhalla Meena. Moreover, the present petitioners are not named in the FIR. Other co-accused-Ghanshyam, Shivdesh @ Shibba, Kuldeep, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The petitioner-Lokesh S/o Halkeram is behind the Bar since 25.01.2025 and Darshan Son Of Shri Javansingh is behind the Bar since 27.09.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record, statement recorded during trial, ground of parity and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:18531] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5087/2025] 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Lokesh S/o Halkeram (2) Darshan Son Of Shri Javansingh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. ( PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/220-221