SONU VERMA @ BOGA v. State of U.P. THRU CHIEF SEC. HOME
A482/5212/2025 · 2025-06-25
Subhash Chandra Sharma
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36453 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5212 of 2025 Applicant :- Sonu Verma @ Boga Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Chief Sec. Home Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar,Chandra Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to direct the learned court below not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every two cases and accept only one surety in lieu of all the above mentioned cases.
3. It is submitted that in this case the applicant is accused in two cases in which he has already been granted bail but on account of non-availability of sureties in each and every case he is not being released from jail. Therefore, request to direct the court below to consider the sureties and personal bonds in one case treating the same for all the two cases which are as Case Crime No.103/2025 and Case Crime No.76/2025. He also relied his argument on the case decided by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. State of U.P. passed in S.L.P. (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018 decided on 29.10.2018 in which learned court below was directed to accept the surety and personal bond and treating the same for all other cases. Therefore, the same benefit may also be extended to the present accused.
4. Learned A.G.A. has not disputed the aforesaid legal position
settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
5. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties as well as the legal position as aforesaid, it is
directed that applicant shall furnish the surety and personal bond in one case which will be considered in both the cases for the purpose of releasing the accused on bail. If this is done, the said personal bond and sureties may be treated to be valid in both the cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail and the same shall be deemed to be adequate compliance of all other bail orders.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of finally. (Subhash Chandra Sharma, J.)
Order Date :- 25.6.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench