- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4128 WP No. 29047 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 29047 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M.RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE MOHANKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 106. 2. DEVIKA W/O LATE SHADUL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O DODDAHATTIHUNDI, DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 106. 3. SHANTHA W/O SWAMYGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 106. 4. SAKAMMA W/O BOGEGOWDA, AGE ABOUT 28 YEARS, DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 016. 5. G.SHEKHAR S/O DEVIKA SHEKAR, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4128 WP No. 29047 of 2017 AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.120, 5TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, B.M.SRI NAGARA, METAGALLI, MYSURU - 570 016. 6. MAHADEVA S/O BOGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 106. 7. SWAMYGOWDA S/O BOGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMARAGOWDNAHALLI POST, ILAWALA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-570 106. 8. H.R.RAJANNA S/O RANGASAMAIAH, EX-SERVICEMAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O NO.278, SLN NILAYA, 6TH CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, KURUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 086. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AISHWARYA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESH.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4128 WP No. 29047 of 2017 KAVERI BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1; SRI. SHARATH.B.BELAVIGI., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Aishwarya., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajesh.A., for the petitioners and Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Smt.Aishwarya., submits that a conscious decision is taken about by the advocate on record and the petitioners about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:4128 WP No. 29047 of 2017 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 27