Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14752 (JHR)

PUNAM DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1543/2025 · 2025-08-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:26204] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1543 of 2025 ------ 1. Punam Devi @ Poonam Devi, aged about 40 years, wife of Pappu Verma 2. Pappu Verma, aged about 41 years, son of Late Kamta Prasad Both are residents of Village Kaushalya Market, Dhanbad Road, P.O. and P.S. Barhi, District Hazaribag, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari, W/O Shashi Verma, D/O Ramdeo Sharan, R/O Isri Bazar, Hatiatand, House No.100, P.O. Isri Bazaar, P.S. Nimiaghat, Dist- Giridih … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-29-08-2025 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 27.11.2024 passed by this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 27.11.2024 passed by this Court to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter. It is next submitted that as the said order dated 27.11.2024 could not be obtained by the petitioners within the stipulated time, hence, the said peremptory order could not be complied with within the stipulated time which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 for non- compliance of the said peremptory order dated 27.11.2024 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 27.11.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3828 of 2023 before the concerned Bench after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/