IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.7076 of 2024 Decided on: 7th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Sapna Sharma ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________________________ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Even though the respondents have not filed reply, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 2. This petition has been filed for grant of following reliefs: - “(a) Those respondents may kindly be directed to give same pay to petitioner which was received by him last time before taking over of his service, from initial date of takeover, with consequential revision of scale 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - thereafter. b) That in other word the pay of the petitioner may kindly be protected in which he was working at the time of takeover from the date of takeover of his services, with all consequential benefits like further revision, arrears etc, and their previous services may be counted for all purposes like increment, pension, seniority etc..” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are covered in light of decision rendered in Rajinder Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The 2 CWPOA No. 690 of 2019, decided alongwith connected matters on 11.03.2022 - 3 - decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 7, 2025 R.Atal