LALLAN PRASAD PAL @ LALLAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
ABAIL/754/2025 · 2025-07-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147506 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147506 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38250 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 754 of 2025 Applicant :- Lallan Prasad Pal @ Lallan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Lalu Prasad Bhatt,Rashmi Srivastava,Sachin Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to F.I.R. No. 481/2023, under sections 323/504/506/354 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, P.S. Visheshwarganj, district Bahraich. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided in view of law laid by Supreme Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another". Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same be decided in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court vide order dated 7.10.2021 passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Order Date :- 7.7.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench