Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010135622025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3574/2025 SMTI PREMODA TAMULI AND 4 ORS W/O SRI ARUP TAMULI, R/O- SARTHEBARI, WARD NO. 04, P.O.- SARTHEBARI, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM 2: SMTI. BARNALI BHUYAN D/O SRI UMESH BHUYAN R/O- SARTHEBARI WARD NO. 09 P.O.- SARTHEBARI DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM 3: SMTI SANGITA DAS W/O SRI NIKHILESH TALUKDAR R/O- SARTHEBARI WARD NO. 08 P.O.- SARTHEBARI DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM 4: DEEPJYOTI DEKA S/O LATE PRAMOD DEKA R/O- SARTHEBARI WARD NO. 01 P.O.- SARTHEBARI DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM 5: BANAJIT DEKA S/O LATE TARUN CHANDRA DEKA R/O- SARTHEBARI WARD NO. 10 P.O.- SARTHEBARI DISTRICT - BARPETA Page No.# 2/3 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DIRECTOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 ASSAM 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781301 4:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SARTHEBARI MUNICIPAL BOARD P.O.- SARTHEBARI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781307 5:THE VICE CHAIRMAN SARTHEBARI MUNICIPAL BOARD P.O.- SARTHEBARI DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 781307 6:SMTI SWARNALATA BARMAN D/O SRI MAHODOR BARMAN VILLAGE AND P.O.- SARTHEBARI DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MR S K CHHETRY,MR. N UDDIN,MR. D A KAIYUM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. N K KALITA (R-6) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 11.08.2025 Heard Shri DA Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri N Das, learned State Counsel, Assam as well as Shri NK Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6. The cause of action is with regard to holding of the election after passing of the No-Confidence Motion. The learned counsel for the parties have jointly informed that the election has been held on 08.08.2025 in which, Smti. Premoda Tamuli has been elected as the Chairman. In view of the aforesaid development, there is no existing cause of action in this writ petition which is accordingly closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant