S. No. 14 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Bail App 66/2025 c/w Bail App 67/2025 TUFAIL AHMAD CHOTA …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Waqar Ul Haq, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION NOWHATTA ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE ORDER 28.11.2025 When these bail applications were taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he in fact is aggrieved of delay in the trial of the case before the Trial court and the delay in trial amounts of violation of the rights of the applicants to speedy trial. He submits the would be satisfied in case the Trial court is asked to conduct the trial and conclude it expeditiously without further delay and in that event, he would not proceed further with these applications. It is being stated that out of 18 witnesses Trial court had already recorded 17 witnesses and an application for production for further evidence under Section 311 Cr.P.C. is still pending. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is ordered that the Trial court shall conclude and decide the case expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Trial court shall make every endeavor to decide the case(s) within a period of six weeks from today. Applications stand Disposed of. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Srinagar 28.11.2025. “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 04.12.2025 10:23