BNSS, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.55 dated 09.07.2025, 309(6), 3(5) and 238 of BNS, Hoshiarpur. 2. custody for named in the FIR, but in the disclosure statement of the co per the allegations, but he is stated to have accompanied the other co were giving and supplementary statement has been recorded was presented on 09.09.2025, charges have not been fr are, in all, 11 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR ated 09.07.2025, registered under Sections 309(6), 3(5) and 238 of BNS, 2023, at Police Station Talwara, District Hoshiarpur. Learned counsel contends that t custody for more than 2 months. He alleges false implication. named in the FIR, but in the disclosure statement of the co per the allegations, though no specific injury has been attributed to him stated to have accompanied the other co were giving daang blows. There is a delay of 5 days in lodging the FIR and supplementary statement has been recorded was presented on 09.09.2025, charges have not been fr are, in all, 11 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR registered under Sections 333, 115(2), 117(2), 2023, at Police Station Talwara, District Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in He alleges false implication. He is not named in the FIR, but in the disclosure statement of the co-accused. As no specific injury has been attributed to him, stated to have accompanied the other co-accused, all of whom There is a delay of 5 days in lodging the FIR and supplementary statement has been recorded after 15 days. Challan was presented on 09.09.2025, charges have not been framed yet and there are, in all, 11 PWs. He is not involved in any other case. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.11.10 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 3. The custody certificate dated 07.11.2025, filed by the learned State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind bars for 2 months and 13 days. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner of having accompanied the co-accused. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 5. Heard. 6. 7. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.11.10 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. (iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of. (v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner. (vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court. (ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner. 8. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 9. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.11.10 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.