Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14746 (KAR)

SRI SUBRAMANI v. M/S MANNAPURAM CHITS (K) PVT LTD

CRL.RP/186/2024 · 2025-02-17

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6861 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 186 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI SUBRAMANI S/O BABU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.30, 21ST MAIN ROAD, J.C.NAGAR, KAMAKSHIPALYA, BANGALORE-560079 AND ALSO AT NO.30, 18TH MAIN, J.C.NAGAR, VALLEY COLLEGE ROAD, KUKRUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHADEVAIAH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. M/S. MANNAPURAM CHITS (K) PVT. LTD., NO.881/F, 1ST FLOOR, V.S. ARCADE, 2ND STAGE, SANKARMUTT BUS STOP, BANGALORE-560079. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT LEGAL MANAGER, SRI. RAMESHA D.K. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6861 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2024 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PASSED BY THE HONBLE LXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-69) AT BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.606/2020, DATED 16.11.2023 AND IN C.C.NO.10865/2018 DATED 07.01.2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE VI ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXVII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU AND THEREBY ACQUIT THE ACCUSED/PETITIONER FROM THE CHARGES LEVELLED COMMENSURATING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ABOVE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. In the previous occasion also, when the matter was listed 4th time for non-compliance office objections, no representation and this Court in the ends of justice, granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections on payment of cost of Rs.500/- and also made it clear that if cost is not paid and office objections are not complied within two weeks, list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the order also, the counsel has not paid the cost - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6861 CRL.RP No. 186 of 2024 and not complied the office objections. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27