1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1162 of 2011 ------ Progressive Construction Ltd. having its office at 7th Floor, Raghava North Block, R.R. Towers, Chirag Ali Lane, Hyderabad-500001 and further having its site office at Km. 339, Village-Hesla, P.S.-Bagodar, District-Giridih, State-Jharkhand-825322, represented through Project Manager Imadi Chandra Shekhar son of Lage I. Polaiah, resident of House no.1-150 D Ward Behind New RTC Bus Stand, Markapur, District-Prakasam, State-Andhra Pradesh. …. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, represented through Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District Ranchi, 2. The Deputy Commissioner, P.O. & P.S.-Sadar, District-Giridih, 3. The Assistant Mining Officer, P.O. & P.S.-Sadar, District-Giridih, 4. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, National Highway Authority of India, Ministry of Road, Transport & Highways, Government of India, having Head Office at G-5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarika, New Delhi-110075. 5. The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, NHAI Complex, Kandra, Village & P.O.-Bhitia, P.S.-Govindpur, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ------ For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II Mrs. Abhilash Kumar, AC to GP-II ------ 03/Dated: 21.02.2025 1. This writ petition is of the year, 2011. 2. When the matter was on board on 11.02.2021 and 24.01.2025, 2 no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as such, following orders were passed:- “03/11.02.2021 None appears for the parties. This case requires detailed hearing. Admit. Since the respondents have already appeared, notices are not required to be issued. Put up this case in usual course.” “Order No.02/Dated 24th January, 2025 1. The case is under the heading for “Hearing” as has been admitted on 11.02.2021. It appears from the said order that none had represented the petitioner on that date. 2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In order to give a chance to the learned counsel for the petitioner, list this matter on 31.01.2025.” 3. The matter has been posted today in order to give chance to the learned counsel for the petitioner, but even today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Rohit/-