IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jannu State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Saleem for respondent No.8 DEEPAK SIBAL In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 22.04.2024, the Assistant Commissioner, Ist Grade, Nuh (Mewat) has passed an order dated 09.07.2024 which order has been CWP-2025. In the light of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the passing of the afore referred order dated 09.07.2024, he would in accordance with law. October 29, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.121 2nd case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28184 Date of Decision : Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Jaskirat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate, for respondent No.8-Gram Panchayat. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 22.04.2024, the Assistant Commissioner, Ist Grade, Nuh (Mewat) has passed an order dated 09.07.2024 which order has been placed before us through filing of CM In the light of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the passing of the afore referred order dated 09.07.2024, he would be at liberty to in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8184 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.10.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Gram Panchayat. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 22.04.2024, the Assistant Commissioner, Ist Grade, Nuh (Mewat) has passed an order dated placed before us through filing of CM-9903- In the light of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the passing of the afore at liberty to challenge the same DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.11.04 09:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document