CRM M-3700 345 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Pankaj State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, of Cr.P.C. petitioner in case bearing FIR No. Sections 302, 201 IPC Panipat, whereby the petitioner has been implicated with the allegation of 2. on merits, but prays for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial while considering the fact that the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the peti custody for the past about 03 years. 3. prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. considering the facts and circumstances of the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the petitioner is the only accused who has already suffered incarceration for a period of about 03 years and out of 27 prosecution witnesses, 10 have already been examined, t 3700-2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M Date of Decision: VERSUS State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.Naveen Kashyap, Advocate Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.A.G. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present second of Cr.P.C., prayer has been made for grant of petitioner in case bearing FIR No. Sections 302, 201 IPC, registered at Police Station , whereby the petitioner has been implicated with the allegation of committing murder of Bintu. At the outset, learned counsel does not press the petition on merits, but prays for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial while considering the fact that the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the peti custody for the past about 03 years. Learned State counsel does not dispute the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the petitioner is the only accused who has already suffered incarceration for a period of about 03 years and out of 27 prosecution witnesses, 10 have already been examined, this petition is disposed of with a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RM M-3700-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.01.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Naveen Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. Hitesh Pandit, Addl.A.G., Haryana second petition filed under Section 4 prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.415 dated 31.12.2011 under , registered at Police Station Matlauda, District , whereby the petitioner has been implicated with the committing murder of Bintu. At the outset, learned counsel does not press the petition on merits, but prays for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial while considering the fact that the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the petitioner is in Learned State counsel does not dispute the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the present case wherein the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the petitioner is the only accused who has already suffered incarceration for a period of about 03 years and out of 27 prosecution witnesses, 10 his petition is disposed of with a 439 regular bail to the under Matlauda, District , whereby the petitioner has been implicated with the At the outset, learned counsel does not press the petition on merits, but prays for issuance of a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial while considering the fact that the FIR in tioner is in Learned State counsel does not dispute the innocuous In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides and wherein the FIR in question was registered in the year 2011 and the petitioner is the only accused who has already suffered incarceration for a period of about 03 years and out of 27 prosecution witnesses, 10 his petition is disposed of with a SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM M-3700 request of learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of 06 months from today, in case there is no legal impediment. 5. stand disposed of. 28.01.2025 sanjay 3700-2025 (O&M) [2] request of learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of 06 months from today, in case there is no legal impediment. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. .01.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? request of learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of 06 months from today, in case Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No request of learned trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of 06 months from today, in case also SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document