KRISHNA KUMAR MAURYA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/5196/2025 · 2025-06-24
Subhash Chandra Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 147403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36239 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5196 of 2025 Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Maurya And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
1. Sri Ashwini Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No.2 in Court today, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A., learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and perused the material on record.
3. It is submitted that in this case both the parties are entered into compromise and matter in dispute has been settled amicably. In pursuance to the
order of this Court dated 13.09.2024, compromise has been verified by the learned trial court regarding which report transmitted by the learned trial court is on record, therefore, request to quash the entire proceedings of the case on the basis of compromise between the parties.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party as well as learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard.
5. On considering the facts and circumstances of
the case, submissions made by learned counsel for both the parties as well as learned A.G.A. and the fact that dispute between the parties has been settled amicably and compromise entered into between the parties which has already been verified by the learned trial court copy of which is on record, therefore, it will be of no use to keep the proceedings pending before the learned court. As a result, it will be in the interest of justice to quash the entire proceedings of the case in terms of compromise.
6. Accordingly, the impugned charge sheet No.1 & 2 of 2020 in Case Crime No.84 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 406 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur, is hereby quashed in terms of compromise between the parties.
7. Accordingly, the present application is, hereby, allowed. [Subhash Chandra Sharma, J.]
Order Date :- 24.6.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench