Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 147372 (MAD)

S.Devaraj v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl.(MD)/351/2025 · 2025-07-01

B Pugalendhi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. Crl(MD)No.351 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.351 of 2025 S.Devaraj ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch-1, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-1, Thoothukudi. 4.S.Charles 5. Nallathambi 6. Malathi ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 3rd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.11.2025 within a time stipulated by this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl(MD)No.351 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu For R1 to R3 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R The petitioner's grievance is that the respondents 4 to 6 have received money from him, under the guise of arranging a job for his son-in-law and have cheated him. Therefore, he has lodged a complaint before the third respondent, but the same has not been enquired and therefore, this petitioner is before this Court with this writ petition. 2.Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that the complaint of this petitioner was enquired by the respondent police in current paper enquiry in P4/42838/604/2024, dated 09.11.2024 and the same was closed by the respondent police as the petitioner undertook to appear before the respondent with the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl(MD)No.351 of 2025 correct address of the opposite party. He further submits that the attempts made by the respondent police to find out the address of the opposite party also failed. A copy of the closure report is also placed before this Court. 3.Recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with a direction to the respondent police to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. 01.07.2025 Index:Yes Internet:Yes vrn 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl(MD)No.351 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch-1, Thoothukudi. 3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch-1, Thoothukudi. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. Crl(MD)No.351 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.351 of 2025 01.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis