Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14737 (CHH)

ARVIIND KANT PODDAR v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA

WPS/3123/2018 · 2025-04-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16587 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3123 of 2018 • Arvind Kant Poddar S/o Shri Jagdev Lal Poddar, Aged About 63 Years R/o 115, Trimurthi Chowk, Sunder Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. Food Corporation Of India Through Its Manager Vigilance For Area Manager Vidhan Sabha Road, Kapa, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The General Manager (R), Regional Office, Vidhan Sabha Marg Pandri, Post Pandri Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Union Of India, Ministry Of Food And Civil Supply, New Delhi ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two round. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 3 : : Mr. B.P. Gupta, Advocate Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, Central Government Counsel Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of petitioners for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 29/12/2016 passed by the respondent No.1 i.e. Manager Vigilance for Area Manager and respondent may be directed to pay the back wages. Retiral dues, gratuity, G.P.F. and other monetary benefits to the petitioner. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed, fit by this Hon’ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favour of the petitioner.” 2. In first round, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even in second round, there was no representation. 3. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed on this count alone. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti