Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14737 (BOM)

MANGALA MUKUNDA NAVTHAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/4548/2017 · 2025-06-18

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 96-97.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4548 OF 2017 MANGALA MUKUNDA NAVTHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 4549 OF 2017 HIRABAI BABASAHEB KHANDAGALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Pradeep V. Ambade, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. D. Patil, AGP for Respondents-State. .. CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 18th JUNE, 2025. P.C.:- 1. The learned Advocate appearing for petitioners fairly submits that Writ Petitions become infructuous by lapse of time. 2. In view of above, Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) JUDGE Devendra/June-2025 2025:BHC-AUG:15533